Please login or register to post comments   |  Login  |   Register 
   Home  |  Wednesday, August 20, 2008

A fighter for families


View Article

Current Articles | Categories | Search | Syndication

Tuesday, July 24, 2007
Schakowsky Statement on Dumping INdustrial Waste Into Lake Michigan
By ariel glasser @ 4:39 PM
Washington, D.C.--U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) delivered the following remarks on the House floor today to voice her strong support for H. Con. Res. 187 - Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the dumping of industrial waste into the Great Lakes. The resolution was introduced by Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL) after British Petroluem (BP) received approval from the State of Indiana and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to dump 54 percent more ammonia and 35 percent more liquid waste into Lake Michigan.

"I thank the gentleman for yielding to me. Let me just give you a few numbers here. 30 million. That’s the number of people who depend on the great lakes for our drinking water. 20%. That’s the percent of fresh surface water on the entire planet that is represented by the great lakes. 6 billion dollars. That’s the amount of money that BP earned in the last quarter. One of the most profitable companies on the entire planet, and a company that has spent a considerable amount of money promoting its green image.

I want to quote to you from a Chicago Tribune “Voice of the People” article that was written by the BP Whiting refinery individual, and he talks about – he minimizes -- the problem. He says, “of the 23 substances regulated in the permit, ammonia and total suspended solids are the only 2 limits that will increase when compared to the current permit.” No problem. Only 2 out of 23. And later, consistent with BP’s bragging about its environmental excellence, says – about itself -- “this is just one of the ways we’ve demonstrated our focus on continual improvement in environmental performance. Our commitment to continuous improvement will carry on as we modernize the refinery.” Meantime, increasing the amount of ammonia and total suspended solid waste.

What’s the consequence of those emissions? The health consequences can’t be understated. Dumping ammonia represents a direct threat to millions of Americans living in the Great Lakes region. For example, ammonia in the water promotes algae blooms that can kill fish and trigger beach closings. So here’s another number – 1,584 pounds of ammonia – a 54% increase every day. Every day, into our precious Lake Michigan . And, 4,925 pounds of liquid waste consisting of suspended particulate matter – a 35% increase every day into Lake Michigan.

In addition to putting our health at risk, the decision to allow BP to increase their dumping also puts the lake’s ecosystem in jeopardy. Increasing the amount of liquid waste consisting of suspended particulate matter dumped into the lake each day endangers the marine life by making the water cloudy thereby making it more difficult for fish to find ample amounts of oxygen. This is a big deal. This is a serious problem. And it’s incredible that the environmental protection agency, that BP, and that the state of Indiana would allow it. It’s an outrage, we can stop it. Thank you."
Comments
Excellent points you bring up about how America has fallen short in infrastructure, education, etc., etc.
But it is wrong to infer that the Iraq War is why these problems persist. That's simply partisan rhetoric. Those problems were there before Bush and the Republicans took the reigns.
Prior to that, Democrats had continuous control of Congress for 40 years, spent trillions of dollars, and those problems only got worse.
Take Louisiana as an example. Democrats have had an absolute monopoly on political power there for decades. In that time, billions of federal tax dollars went to New Orleans, supposedly earmarked to fix the levees. Where did all the money go? Louisiana policy makers set the stage for the Katrina disaster in New Orleans long before Bush got us into Iraq.

We are all war weary. Harping on General Petraeus' projection of America being in Iraq for another ten years ignores how long Americans have had to be stationed as peacekeepers in other war zones. We've been in Germany and the Philipines sixty years and South Korea for fifty. It should be noted that those wars, and Vietnam included, were begun by Democrat presidents.
Bush's War appears- for now- to have been a futile effort resulting in nothing other than chaos and pointless slaughter.Time will tell. Eventually, Bush may one day be regarded as the Leonidis of his times.
History may look more kindly on Bush's actions than on his Democratic predecessor's lack of action. President Bill Clinton did NOT send American troops to stop the genocide in the Rwanda in the 1990's. Many believe that if Clinton had sent troops, America would have prevented what is now known to have been the worst civilian massacre in modern history.

posted @ Saturday, September 01, 2007 8:58 PM by Tom Edwards


You must be logged in to post a comment. You can login here